Files
jhonny-editor/code/docs/industry/project-intake-workflow.md
T
João Henrique b541f502ba feat: initial commit - Jhonny Editor
- Adicionado estrutura completa do projeto
- Configurado MCP server para Premiere Pro
- Adicionado documentação e skills
- Configurado Gitignore para o projeto
2026-09-08 09:59:31 -04:00

32 KiB
Executable File

Project Intake Assistant contract

Contract ID: INDUSTRY-01 Version: 0.1.0-draft Status: proposed product contract; not a production-readiness claim Last reviewed against source tree: 2026-08-22

Purpose and implementation status

Project Intake Assistant is a bounded, assistant-editor workflow for inspecting media that is already in a Premiere project, proposing deterministic organization and metadata changes, applying only an approved subset, and recording what is known about the result. It is deliberately a workflow around existing MCP actions, not a claim that an AI can make editorial decisions.

There is no current project_intake MCP tool, facility-template schema, or production-ready end-to-end intake workflow in this repository. This document is the contract for building one. The current source provides useful, narrower building blocks:

  • verify_premiere_connection is a read-only connection check that avoids returning project names, paths, and media details.
  • Authenticated UXP discovery is capability-gated at the connected host; a failed UXP command must not silently fall back to CEP or QE.
  • The authenticated UXP surface can inspect a compact revisioned project snapshot, Project-panel selection, bounded media health, proxy/ingest state, metadata, and project/Production storage state. It also has guarded project item organization and a reviewed organization-plan apply route.

Those are current source capabilities with their own limits, not evidence that they work in every licensed Premiere build. See the supported-actions catalog, UXP capability foundation, stable workflow matrix, and editorial workflow host-validation runbook.

In this contract, Current means implemented in the source tree and documented at the linked repository reference. Proposed means a required addition for Project Intake; it must not be advertised as callable or production-ready until it passes the acceptance gates below.

Scope

In scope

The first implementation MUST support a selected, explicit set of project items in one connected project. It MAY propose only these classes of work when the connected host advertises the necessary capability:

  1. Read-only readiness checks: connection, host capability, active-project identity, project snapshot revision, Project-panel selection, bounded media health, proxy/ingest state, metadata state, and storage preflight.
  2. Deterministic facility rules: expected bin destination, allowed color label, naming pattern, and allowlisted metadata fields.
  3. Review-only organization plans that identify exact project-item IDs and expected parent IDs.
  4. Explicitly approved bin creation, moves, color labels, and allowlisted metadata updates through documented UXP operations.
  5. A redacted operation receipt with per-operation certainty and recovery instructions.

The workflow MUST begin read-only. A template check whose required host field is not exposed by the selected capability MUST report unsupported or not_inspected; it MUST NOT be inferred as a pass.

Frame-rate evidence follows the same fail-closed rule. A non-finite or out-of-range host value becomes an item-level FRAME_RATE_UNSUPPORTED finding and makes the report incomplete; it does not abort inspection of unrelated items. Valid decimal readings are matched after snapping values within 0.005 fps of a canonical timebase, then using a maximum 0.05 fps tolerance for non-canonical Premiere measurements. Canonical rates such as 23.976 and 24 remain distinct.

Non-goals

Project Intake v0.1 MUST NOT:

  • choose story, selects, pacing, or any other editorial judgment;
  • import arbitrary files, scan disks, or treat a filesystem folder as the intake scope without a separate approved, workspace-gated import contract;
  • inspect codecs, frame rates, audio-channel layouts, timecode, duplicate media, or proxy completeness unless the exact source field and its real-host support are added to the capability matrix;
  • change a timeline, create a rough cut, replace media, relink media, attach a proxy, change ingest state, configure scratch disks, delete an item, or save a project as part of ordinary intake;
  • call a generative, transcription, translation, cloud-analysis, or media upload provider;
  • use filenames, a model guess, or a non-unique display name as mutation authority;
  • claim atomic cross-command rollback, visual correctness, rendered-output correctness, copyright clearance, or production readiness.

Some excluded operations are separately exposed by the current UXP surface (for example proxy attachment, relink, and storage configuration), but have their own confirmation, workspace, non-undo, or verification boundaries. They are intentionally outside this contract. See supported actions and local-first editorial workflow boundaries.

Personas and authority model

Actor May do Must not do
Assistant editor (operator) Select the intake scope, review findings, edit the proposed plan, approve or reject a concrete plan, inspect the receipt. Approve a plan on behalf of another person or bypass a stale-plan check.
Post supervisor (workflow owner) Publish an approved template version, decide the permitted operation classes, review exceptions and pilot evidence. Treat a receipt as proof of picture, sound, or delivery quality.
Facility administrator Configure local bridge installation, approved workspace policy, identity/role integration, and retention policy. Put secrets, native paths, media names, or transcripts into persistent workflow checkpoints.
MCP client / model Request inspection and construct a plan strictly from the template and returned evidence. Create its own template, self-approve, invent targets, or treat a recommendation as mutation authority.
UXP bridge / Premiere host Advertise capabilities, execute a documented operation, and return its command-specific readback. Establish licensed-host validity, visual quality, or an unexposed postcondition by itself.

Proposed authority rule: inspect requires read authority and an authenticated, connected host where UXP data is used. plan and preview are non-mutating. confirm requires an attributable human identity plus the exact plan digest. apply requires edit authority, a current host capability attestation, the same project identity/revision, and an unexpired confirmation. Only the UXP route is eligible for Project Intake mutations. CEP/QE fallback is forbidden even if a similarly named legacy action is available.

The existing reviewed organization route already uses server-issued plan and preview-confirmation material, stable source/parent guards, and UXP-only bin transactions; it reports partial completion instead of rolling back a prior bin creation. Project Intake MUST preserve those semantics rather than wrap them in an "all-or-nothing" claim. See local-first editorial workflows and apply_editorial_organization_plan.

Required state machine

Each request has one immutable requestId; each planned mutation has a unique operationId. A state transition is append-only in the proposed receipt ledger. The only mutation state is Apply.

Inspect -> Plan -> Preview -> Confirm -> Apply -> Verify -> Receipt
                 |          |          |         |
                 +-> Reject +-> Expire +-> Stop -+
State Required behavior Mutation allowed?
Inspect Verify the intended backend, collect only capability-supported evidence, resolve stable target IDs, and capture project/revision locks. No
Plan Evaluate the immutable template against the inspection snapshot. Produce explicit findings and individual candidate operations. No
Preview Re-inspect the target project and guards, calculate a canonical plan digest, show before/after intent and limitations, then issue an opaque confirmation token. No
Confirm Record an identifiable human's explicit approval of the exact template version, plan digest, target project, and expiry. Any edit creates a new plan. No
Apply Re-check host capability, project identity/revision, confirmation, and every operation guard immediately before dispatch. Execute bounded operations; do not auto-retry an uncertain commit. Yes, only the approved operations
Verify Reinspect the exact host state exposed for each completed operation. Classify each result with a certainty state; stop on an unknown mutation or policy-defined failure. No new mutation
Receipt Persist or return a privacy-redacted, append-only record of the plan, approvals, results, certainty, evidence references, and recovery instructions. No

Preconditions and stop conditions

The workflow MUST stop before mutation when any of the following is true:

  • no active authenticated UXP bridge or the required command is not advertised;
  • the selected project cannot be identified by a stable host project ID/GUID;
  • the active project changed after Inspect or Preview;
  • the current project/context revision differs from the preview lock;
  • the template version/digest, plan digest, confirmation token, operator identity, or policy scope differs from the approved value;
  • any target resolves to zero or multiple project items, or lacks an expected parent guard for a move;
  • a confirmation expires, is rejected, or is not attributable to a human;
  • an operation would be outside the template's permitted operation types or metadata allowlist.

The current project-context and editorial-plan foundations already reject stale context/timeline revisions and keep review receipts separate from mutation authority. Their snapshot is a useful input, but it does not prove that the live host stayed unchanged; Project Intake therefore MUST re-inspect the host immediately before Apply. See project-context invalidation and editorial-plan workflow.

Stable IDs, revision locks, and digests

Current identifiers to reuse

  • Host project identity: use the UXP project GUID/ID returned by the revisioned project snapshot or project-session surface. Do not substitute a project name or path.
  • Project-item identity: use the UXP Project-panel item ID. A display name may appear in preview copy but is never a mutation selector.
  • Parent identity: every move records the exact expectedParentId from inspection and must fail if it changed before dispatch.
  • Host snapshot revision: retain the project.snapshot revision from the same inspection pass as the resolved IDs.
  • Context revisions: if local project context is used, retain its source, timeline, and combined context revisions separately. The current context engine hashes persisted project/media-path identities, and distinguishes a source change from a timeline-placement change.

The current project snapshot and Project-panel selection resolver are bounded host reads; the current organization operations use stable project-item and parent guards. See UXP capability foundation, next-ten workflow matrix, and project context engine.

Proposed locking algorithm

  1. Inspect the explicitly selected project/items and capture hostProjectId, hostSnapshotRevision, selectedItemIds, and each selected item's current parent ID.
  2. Canonicalize the approved template, the plan, and the selected target list using deterministic key ordering and UTF-8 JSON. Compute SHA-256 digests for the template and plan.
  3. Bind the preview confirmation to the host project ID, snapshot revision, template digest, plan digest, capability-attestation ID, operator identity, and expiry.
  4. Immediately before each operation, reacquire the minimal relevant host state. Reject a changed project ID, stale snapshot/revision, missing capability, changed parent, changed metadata guard, or changed selection.
  5. Use a unique operationId for every host mutation. An operation that times out or loses the bridge after dispatch is not repeated automatically; it must be inspected before a human decides whether to create a new plan.

The digest and attestation binding are proposed. The repository already uses opaque confirmation tokens and revision-locked previews in its editorial workflow, while the proposed metadata batch planner calls for an exact project revision, plan digest, per-item certainty, and no retry of unknown commits. See editorial workflow and metadata batch planner recommendation.

Contract schemas

The following are proposed JSON contract shapes. They are intentionally separate from existing individual MCP tool schemas. They use synthetic IDs and contain no native paths, real project names, media names, prompts, transcript content, or credentials.

Intake request

{
  "schemaVersion": "project-intake-request/v0.1",
  "requestId": "pi-20260822-0001",
  "template": {
    "id": "documentary-intake",
    "version": "3.2.0",
    "sha256": "sha256:<template-digest>",
    "permittedOperations": ["create_bin", "move_item", "set_color", "update_metadata"],
    "organizationRules": [
      {
        "ruleId": "interview",
        "destination": { "parentBinId": "bin-root", "name": "Interviews", "colorIndex": 4 },
        "match": { "mode": "operator-selected-only" }
      }
    ],
    "metadataAllowlist": ["project.description", "xmp.dc:subject"]
  },
  "scope": {
    "hostProjectId": "project-guid-redacted",
    "projectViewId": "view-redacted",
    "selectedProjectItemIds": ["item-redacted-01", "item-redacted-02"]
  },
  "policy": {
    "id": "facility-default",
    "version": "1",
    "requireHumanConfirmation": true,
    "allowPersistentContext": false
  }
}

Validation requirements: the template is immutable/versioned; IDs are unique; the scope contains at least one exact host item ID; every metadata key is allowlisted; and the caller cannot widen the template's operation set. A rule using a semantic filename match is outside v0.1. The existing organization plan requires caller-supplied rules and deliberately does not infer categories from filenames; this contract keeps the same safety posture. See local-first editorial workflows.

Inspection and proposed plan

{
  "schemaVersion": "project-intake-plan/v0.1",
  "requestId": "pi-20260822-0001",
  "state": "preview",
  "binding": {
    "hostProjectId": "project-guid-redacted",
    "hostSnapshotRevision": "uxp-redacted",
    "templateSha256": "sha256:<template-digest>",
    "capabilityAttestationId": "proposed-attestation-id"
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "findingId": "finding-01",
      "kind": "organization",
      "status": "actionable",
      "targetId": "item-redacted-01",
      "evidence": { "expectedParentId": "bin-root" },
      "message": "Selected item is approved for the configured destination."
    },
    {
      "findingId": "finding-02",
      "kind": "codec",
      "status": "unsupported",
      "message": "No Project Intake codec-field capability is implemented in this contract version."
    }
  ],
  "operations": [
    {
      "operationId": "pi-op-01",
      "type": "move_item",
      "target": { "projectItemId": "item-redacted-01", "expectedParentId": "bin-root" },
      "destination": { "binId": "bin-interviews" },
      "expectedPostcondition": { "parentId": "bin-interviews" },
      "authority": "human-confirmed-edit"
    }
  ],
  "limitations": [
    "Host readback establishes only exposed structural fields.",
    "No render, playback, or editorial-quality verification is included."
  ],
  "planSha256": "sha256:<plan-digest>",
  "confirmation": { "required": true, "expiresAt": "2026-08-22T20:00:00Z" }
}

Every finding MUST say whether it is pass, actionable, warning, unsupported, not_inspected, or blocked; absence of a finding is never a pass. Every mutation operation MUST provide an exact stable target, precondition, expected postcondition, authority class, and recovery instruction. The capabilityAttestationId is proposed: the existing recommendation describes a nonce-bound, short-lived host capability attestation, but it is not a current production feature. See host capability attestation recommendation.

Receipt

{
  "schemaVersion": "project-intake-receipt/v0.1",
  "receiptId": "pir-20260822-0001",
  "requestId": "pi-20260822-0001",
  "endedState": "receipt",
  "binding": {
    "hostProjectId": "project-guid-redacted",
    "hostSnapshotRevision": "uxp-redacted",
    "templateSha256": "sha256:<template-digest>",
    "planSha256": "sha256:<plan-digest>",
    "sourceCommit": "<40-character-source-sha>",
    "panelBuild": "<panel-build-hash>"
  },
  "approval": {
    "approvedBy": "operator-pseudonym-or-enterprise-user-id",
    "approvedAt": "2026-08-22T19:00:00Z",
    "confirmationId": "opaque-confirmation-token"
  },
  "operations": [
    {
      "operationId": "pi-op-01",
      "type": "move_item",
      "result": "structurally_verified",
      "verificationBoundary": "project_item_parent_readback",
      "evidenceRefs": ["redacted-host-response-ref"],
      "recovery": "Use Premiere Undo after visually confirming the item and destination."
    }
  ],
  "summary": { "planned": 1, "applied": 1, "structurallyVerified": 1, "unknown": 0 },
  "privacy": { "nativePathsIncluded": false, "mediaNamesIncluded": false, "transcriptContentIncluded": false },
  "receiptSha256": "sha256:<canonical-receipt-digest>"
}

receiptSha256 is a proposed integrity checksum, not a signature, C2PA claim, or proof that no later Premiere edit occurred. Receipt storage/transport and tamper-evident signing require a separate security design. The existing host-validation runbook requires redacted host facts, fixture checksum, before/ after evidence, structured response, and Undo evidence for a passed mutation; Project Intake receipts SHOULD reference the same kind of evidence without embedding sensitive data. See host-validation runbook.

Result certainty

The receipt MUST report a result for the workflow and for every proposed operation. The following contract normalization is proposed; it maps current command-specific UXP outcomes without weakening their stated boundaries.

Certainty Meaning Retry rule
planned No mutation was dispatched. A new plan may be created.
rejected_before_mutation A validation, authority, freshness, or capability check stopped the operation before dispatch. Correct the cause and start a new Inspect/Plan cycle.
committed_unverified Premiere accepted/committed the command, but the contract lacks a required readback for the requested effect. Never retry automatically; inspect the host before a human decides next action.
structurally_verified The command-specific host readback matches the expected structural postcondition. Do not retry; this is not visual, playback, or render proof.
render_verified A separately specified exported artifact was verified by the applicable output-file/render procedure. Not emitted by ordinary v0.1 Project Intake operations.
partial At least one operation is structurally verified and a later operation did not complete or is uncertain. Stop the remaining batch, inspect known changes, then create a new plan.
unknown_mutation Dispatch may have reached Premiere, but a timeout/disconnect/invalid response prevents knowing whether it changed state. Do not retry; require host inspection and a fresh human decision.
failed The operation failed before a confirmed postcondition; the receipt must state whether mutation is known absent or unknown. Follow the classified recovery instruction.
unsupported / not_run The capability or test evidence is absent. Do not substitute another backend or a heuristic.

Current UXP workflows already use command-specific readback and, for some operations, committed_unverified; the current organization route reports verified actions as partial if a later action fails and never silently rolls back or retries an unknown commit. Current verified is structured host readback, not licensed-host visual/render validation. See third-wave workflow matrix, editorial workflows, and transaction deadline/readback recommendation.

Failure taxonomy and recovery

Code Classification Required receipt data and recovery
PI_CONNECTION_UNAVAILABLE rejected_before_mutation Backend requested, connection-check result, and instruction to reconnect; no fallback mutation.
PI_CAPABILITY_MISSING unsupported Required command and advertised capability set; leave the check unresolved.
PI_PROJECT_IDENTITY_CHANGED rejected_before_mutation Expected/current redacted project IDs; restart Inspect.
PI_REVISION_STALE rejected_before_mutation Expected/current revision fingerprints; restart Inspect and Preview.
PI_TEMPLATE_OR_PLAN_MISMATCH rejected_before_mutation Template/plan digest identifiers only; obtain a new approval.
PI_CONFIRMATION_INVALID rejected_before_mutation Non-sensitive reason: missing, expired, rejected, or wrong approver; do not dispatch.
PI_TARGET_AMBIGUOUS rejected_before_mutation Candidate stable-ID count and rule ID; require the operator to reselect exact items.
PI_GUARD_FAILED rejected_before_mutation Target ID and expected/current parent or field fingerprint; re-inspect instead of forcing a move.
PI_POLICY_DENIED rejected_before_mutation Policy version and denied operation class; administrator/supervisor must change policy explicitly.
PI_WORKSPACE_DENIED rejected_before_mutation Workspace access mode only; ordinary v0.1 scope should not need a path workaround.
PI_HOST_MODAL_OR_TIMEOUT unknown_mutation if dispatched, otherwise rejected_before_mutation Last known phase and operation ID; inspect Premiere before retry.
PI_INVALID_HOST_READBACK unknown_mutation Raw response stays redacted; stop the batch and inspect the stated target.
PI_PARTIAL_APPLY partial Per-operation certainty, already changed IDs, remaining operations, and explicit Undo/manual recovery guidance.
PI_PRIVACY_VIOLATION rejected_before_mutation Field class rejected, not its value; redact and create a new request.

The implementation MUST preserve the last known state if Apply begins: preflight, dispatch, host return, and readback are distinct phases. It MUST NOT report a successful rollback merely because a later operation failed. This follows the current organization-plan and transaction/readback boundaries. See editorial workflows and transaction deadline/readback recommendation.

Privacy, data handling, and audit rules

Contract rules (proposed)

  1. Project Intake MUST be local-first by default. It MUST enumerate any network egress before a facility enables it and MUST not transmit footage, native paths, media names, transcript content, metadata values, prompts, or receipt bodies to telemetry or a model provider without a separately approved data path and retention policy.
  2. Receipts MUST use stable IDs or one-way/deliberately redacted identifiers; they MUST exclude native paths, media names, transcript content, raw metadata values, credentials, persistent workspace tokens, and full raw host events.
  3. Facility templates MUST be versioned and may contain rule IDs, field keys, and policy references. They MUST NOT contain secrets, production media paths, customer content, or hidden broad filesystem roots.
  4. Persistent state MUST be opt-in and deletable. The workflow MUST surface where it is stored, retention duration, and the clear action.
  5. The authoritative receipt is an operation record, not a training-data grant, provenance assertion, copyright determination, or productivity claim.

Current constraints to honor

The current project-context engine is opt-in and local; it persists project names, hashed project/media-path identities, bounded timeline metadata, and explicit enrichments, while not persisting native paths. It also discards enrichment keys resembling paths, passwords, tokens, secrets, or API keys. Project Intake MUST obtain explicit operator consent before using that store and MUST clear it when the chosen retention policy requires it. See project context storage rules.

The current UXP workspace access model returns neither the native workspace root nor persistent token over MCP, and current workflow checkpoints forbid secrets, paths, transcripts, and media names because persistent values may sync with cloud projects. Project Intake MUST not bypass either boundary. See README UXP workspace policy and third-wave checkpoints.

Host validation matrix

All cases below are proposed Project Intake validation cases and start as not_run. Unit, contract, lint, and mock-bridge tests may validate schemas and failure handling, but cannot mark a case licensed-host verified. Use a copied, disposable project with generated, non-sensitive fixture media; retain redacted responses, before/after Project-panel evidence, and Undo evidence. This extends the existing editorial host-validation runbook.

ID Coverage Procedure Required pass evidence Boundary retained
PI-PLAN-001 Each supported MCP client path on Windows and macOS Inspect a fixture selection; create and preview a plan with one unsupported check. No mutation; IDs/revision/digest present; unsupported check remains unresolved. Does not prove host mutation.
PI-ORG-001 Each claimed Premiere/UXP/OS combination Create or resolve one bin, move one selected item, apply one color rule. Exact stable IDs/parent/color readback, before/after Project-panel captures, and Undo restores fixture. Structural UI state only; no editorial-quality claim.
PI-ORG-002 Same as PI-ORG-001 Change the source parent after Preview. Guard rejects before move; any earlier verified create is recorded as partial and manually undone. No atomic rollback claim.
PI-META-001 Each claimed Premiere/UXP/OS combination Read and update one allowlisted metadata field, including Unicode and no-op cases. Requested-field readback and Undo evidence. Field readback does not validate an external asset-management system.
PI-MEDIA-001 Each claimed Premiere/UXP/OS combination Inspect offline/proxy health for 1, 64, and over-limit selections. Bounded per-item receipt; no path disclosure without explicit approved request. Does not establish real-media availability beyond exposed host state.
PI-PRODUCTION-001 Project and Production fixture where the host advertises it Run storage/ingest preflight without mutation. Redacted preflight response and no project-state change. Does not validate Production configuration mutation.
PI-FAULT-001 Each claimed Premiere/UXP/OS combination Disconnect/timeout after a dispatched fixture mutation; repeat with invalid readback. unknown_mutation, no automatic retry, human inspection decision recorded. Does not prove the prior command did or did not mutate.
PI-PRIVACY-001 Windows and macOS Attempt to place path, token-like, transcript, and media-name fields in template, receipt, and checkpoint inputs. Rejection/redaction before persistence or output. Does not prove third-party provider retention policy.

Each report MUST include source commit, panel build hash, Premiere version, OS version, MCP client, fixture revision/checksum, case status, and evidence references. A case is passed, failed, unsupported, or not_run; a passing schema validator or an MCP response labeled verified is insufficient without human review of the exact host and post-state evidence. The repository now provides a separate, versioned npm run validate:project-intake-host-report -- path/to/redacted-report.json contract for this preview-only workflow. It accepts only the defined Project Intake cases, requires the documented non-mutation postconditions, and rejects project data from the shared evidence index. See the Project Intake host-validation runbook.

Acceptance gates

These are proposed promotion gates. They are not met merely because this document exists or because current automated tests pass.

Contract and implementation gate

  • A versioned JSON schema validates request, plan, confirmation, receipt, and each failure/result state.
  • Tests prove no mutation is reachable from Inspect, Plan, Preview, Confirm, Verify, or Receipt.
  • Tests prove stale project/revision/template/plan/confirmation/parent guards fail before dispatch.
  • Tests prove duplicate or ambiguous targets, unallowlisted metadata, and forbidden operations fail before dispatch.
  • Tests prove a UXP failure never falls back to CEP/QE and an unknown commit is never automatically retried.
  • Tests prove receipts redact forbidden fields and capture per-item partial completion with last known phase.
  • Documentation lists every required host command, version/capability gate, postcondition, certainty boundary, and recovery instruction.

Licensed-host pilot gate

  • At least 100 documented, real-host Project Intake runs across every Premiere/OS/client combination claimed for the workflow, using the matrix above and the exact source/panel builds being considered.
  • Zero wrong-project or wrong-project-item mutations in those runs.
  • At least 99% of attempted supported operations reach their specified structural postcondition, with every exception classified and recoverable.
  • Every mutation has an attributable human confirmation, exact target IDs, before/after evidence, and Undo/manual-recovery evidence appropriate to the operation.
  • No failed or disconnected apply is labeled successful without the required readback; no automatic retry follows an uncertain dispatch.
  • At least two design-partner teams repeat the workflow after supervised use. Any time-saving claim is based on recorded baseline and assisted durations, sample size, and rework—not an estimate.

Security and release gate

  • The deployment mode, model routing, network egress, identity/role behavior, audit retention/deletion, update channel, and emergency revocation path are documented and accepted by the pilot facility.
  • The signed build and source/panel hashes in every receipt are reproducible.
  • A privacy review confirms that templates, context, telemetry, receipts, and host reports follow the rules in this contract.
  • Marketing says "proposed," "pilot," "licensed-host verified for listed combinations," or "unsupported" as applicable; it never extrapolates a successful fixture run to all productions.

Until every applicable gate is met, Project Intake is an implementation/pilot workflow only. Current automated coverage and command-specific UXP readback are valuable engineering evidence, but remain separate from licensed-host and rendered-output evidence. See verification matrix and reproducible live-host lab recommendation.

Implementation checklist

  1. Add the proposed schemas and a canonical-digest implementation without changing existing individual tool semantics.
  2. Add a read-only inspect and plan path first; report unavailable checks explicitly rather than adding heuristics.
  3. Reuse the existing reviewed UXP organization route for a narrow first apply adapter; do not expose direct raw bin operations as the guided workflow.
  4. Add metadata only after a separate exact field allowlist, readback mapping, and host tests exist.
  5. Add confirmation/receipt persistence behind an explicit privacy and identity design; do not put receipt bodies in cloud-synced workflow checkpoints.
  6. Run the host matrix and preserve redacted evidence before widening the supported-version statement.